PEACE
Poll - Should the Israeli
government freeze settlement activity and building in Har Homa in order to jumpstart the
peace process? About half our vistors say so currently. (reminder - one person one vote) . Click to vote
New Section - Background
documents
New Israeli Government - Two Views
MidEast Web - Announcement
A new project to use the Web and
Internet to build a better Middle East has been born of PEACE and the contributions of
many others. See http://www.mideastweb.org to
learn more, and to find out how you can help. Thank you, Shukran, Todah.
New Israeli Government - Two Views
1. Could be Worse
Ami Isseroff
Israel
Here in Israel, Ehud Barak and his government have at last taken the wheel from
Benjamin Nethanyahu, ending three years that can only be described as a fiasco - lost
time, and perhaps lost opportunities in the peace process, an economy in deep trouble.
After running a campaign that hid the peace issue under Barak’s military record
and medals and rhetoric about social change, Barak proclaimed in his Knesset speech that
there is no security without peace, that the four pillars of the peace process must be
Jordan, Egypt, Syria/Lebanon and equally the Palestinians. He invited Israel’s
neighbors to all join in a peace of the brave - borrowing the specific phrase from Yasser
Arafat. On a practical level, he said explicitly that if he had to chose between pursuing
peace and keeping his coalition together he would choose peace.
Barak also appointed Haim Ramon Minister Without Portfolio for Jerusalem and Government
Reform. It seems that the correct translation of the first part of Ramon’s title
would be "Minister for stopping the building in Ras Al- Amud" as Ramon broadly
hinted when interviewed for Israeli Radio. A spokesman for Barak later said that Ramon and
Barak had not discussed the issue. Some people might be naive enough to believe that.
In the entire speech, there was not a word about the hospital beds which Barak brought
up so often during his campaign. It was also a pleasure to hear Ariel Sharon attacking the
government from the opposition benches.
A banner day all in all, though far from perfect. It could be much worse, as we
remember from only a few months ago. But it could have been better. We don’t know
where the fine rhetoric will lead. Bibi (former Prime Minister Nethanyahu) also spoke
about peace when he was sworn in. Those who believed him should have looked at his cabinet
and coalition. Barak’s Cabinet is better, but there are bad signs. Ehud Barak has
chosen odd ways of fitting people to posts and fulfilling promises, to the dissatisfaction
of almost everyone. Yossi Beilin, the Oslo Peace Maker, has been relegated to the Ministry
of Justice. Professor Shlomo Ben-Ami is an academic who has many good ideas regarding
social justice, and could have been the person to bring Morrocan Jews back to the Labor
party. He has been made, of all things, Minister of Public Safety. Shimon Peres, Nobel
Prize Laureate and fighter for peace will be Minister for Regional Coordination, a post
which may or may not have any real content. Beilin and Peres have been neutralized in
meaningless posts where they can do nothing about the peace process.
In a government with so many religious parties, it is natural that there will be Rabbi
ministers. A Rabbi in the Ministry of Religion (what normal country has such a Ministry?)
is one thing. A Rabbi heading the Ministry of Health is quite another! The new Minister of
Health, Shas party MK Rabbi Ben-Izri, isn’t even a miracle working healer rabbi. But
it could be worse. Remember that we almost had a Shas rabbi as Minister of Finance.
Yossi Sarid of Meretz will be Ministry of Education. The good news may
be a break for education for peace and democratic values. The bad news is that as Minister
of Environmental Quality in the Rabin and Peres governments, Sarid was very outspoken on
peace issues, but didn’t get much done to control pollution, move garbage dumps etc.
Haim Ramon is best known for his reform of the health system. He did the impossible in
that case. He proved that it is possible to create a much worse system than the one we
had, confounding all the experts. Now he will have a special job reforming the entire
government. It could be worse - and it may yet be worse.
Women complain that of 32 ministers and assistant ministers, only one
is a women. Arabs complain that they have no representation at all in the present
government. It seems neither group is qualified. It is a government of generals and
rabbis, and there aren’t many women or Arab generals or rabbis. From Barak’s
viewpoint it is therefore perfectly logical.
One Israel party members finally rebelled against some of Barak's
strangest caprices when he tried to appoint Shalom Simchon, a practically unknown and
relatively young backbench Knesset member, to the prestigious post of Chairman of the
Knesset, usually reserved for senior parliamentarians. Instead, the One Israel Party
Central Committee chose Avrum Burg, a popular pro-peace religious member of the former
Labor party, son of a moderate former NRP leader and elder statesman.
Israelis should remember that it was worse, and it could have been
worse. We are commanded to "be joyous in your holidays." Compared to what went
before, this new government is a big improvement, an improvement that can be credited in
part to the Israeli peace lobby and Israeli Arabs who fought the Likud government before
and during the elections. All of those who fought for change can pause to be happy, though
it remains to be seen who will harvest the fruits of victory.
A different opinion is presented below. Other comments are invited.
Ami Isseroff
Rehovoth, Israel
2. New Government - Same Old Thing
Raphael Rechitzky
Canada
After a long (too long in my opinion) time, Israel finally has a government. Not
surprisingly, it also has the same old fashioned type government, which, in common with
the previous ones, is a government that does not care about the people, with a Prime
Minister who only cares about his seat and publicity. This is not the government Israelis
need and it shows again that Israel needs a new leadership, the type that will start
taking care of the little person on the street, the type that will look after important
issues such as housing, including tenant protection, the young people and the elderly,
many of which live under the poverty line. Israel needs a government that will operate
under a very strict and high Code of Ethics. Israel needs the type of government it does
not have, and that will not be found in the Parliament, because all of them only care
about their positions and publicity.
The new Prime Minister has not had a chance to do anything productive as yet, but he is
already traveling to the U.S later this month. Should not he work for a while and prove he
can do something more productive than putting Bibi down? Bibi is gone but that does not
mean any good news to Israelis. If he is replaced by another egotist, one who cares for
himself and becoming important and not the people, Israelis are in for another very
disappointing experience. I am not even sure he has the brain that Bibi has.
Israeli politicians are dirty and do not take into account the needs of the country and
the people. This election, as the previous ones, proved that being a member of parliament
is a good money rewarding job. It also proved that if a Government does not operate under
a very strict Code of Ethics, it will quickly move away from all the nice slogans and
promises and forget all its promises.
Both the Likud and Labor are corrupted movements that most Israelis in my opinion
resent. Israelis vote for what they have and in most cases they choose the best from the
worst, not knowing that they are both the same.
I would like to go back to the 1976 elections that brought Menahem Begin’s Likud
Party to power. I do remember that year very well, since I was heavily involved in it
myself. That election is probably the most important one in Israel's history, since it
showed that people were in fact unhappy with both parties and the old system. All analysts
seem to miss that important point. If you remember, Israelis voted in huge numbers for a
then new movement: Dash (Democratic Change Party), which, failing to have a high Code of
Ethics, failed badly later. Israelis gave politicians a message: 'We don't like the old
movements, we want something new, a leadership that we can trust and depend on, one that
will take care of the little person on the street'. If one tries to analyze all the
following elections, one has to conclude that Israelis paid and continue to pay a very
heavy price for a corrupted system of favoritism, a system that the Labor created 50 years
ago and now highly used by all parties.
The Shas ultra-orthodox party is another example of people who are confused and unhappy
and so vote for something they feel they can identify with. Those who were unhappy with
the system and felt that no-one represented them, Sephardic groups in this case, felt they
could identify with this group. By supporting Shas, they created an abnormal party that is
supposed to be ultra orthodox, but which is supported by many who are not orthodox, but
can identify themselves with the Sephardic movement.
Two small examples of how much Israeli politicians are dishonest and self centered are:
1. The main parties never agreed to get together and change the election system, so the
fanatics and the interest groups could not get the power they have. They all thought:
"Well, one day we may need them, so lets keep them in".
2. They all agreed not to let Israelis abroad vote, because they were scared of the
power that group could have.
This is a very broad subject, but I would like to conclude by predicting, sadly that
that Barak will fail to improve the quality of life for the little Israeli. He will fail
to make the little Israeli who voted him in a top priority. Thus, the Israelis will again
become victims of a corrupt system that needs to be changed, an old fashioned system that
needs to be removed from the Israeli political scene.
On a more positive note, as has happened many times in history, natural forces will
push for change. One day Israelis will be able to enjoy living in Israel under a regime
they could call their own. The need for more responsible government will eventually create
one, a government of which Israelis can be proud.
Link - :Len
and Libby Traubman have compiled their messages regarding Israeli/Palestinian cooperative
projects at http://www.igc.org/traubman/messages.htm
What
is PEACE?
PEACE is a Mid - East Dialog Group commited to peace and neighborly
relations.We have no official political opinions. PEACE was started by Ameen Hannoun, a
Jordanian/Palestinian and Ami Isseroff, an Israeli. You are welcome to join, and to
contribute ariticles and ideas for promoting peace and dialog. More about PEACE.
Politics are no
Panacea [June 6] - a different attitude will be needed to bring peace
to the Middle East. More
Life after Bibi [May
22] - A program for
peace More
The Bittersweet
Taste of Victory - The end of the Bibi era and what it means More
Israeli
elections [May 18] - The difficulty of forming a coalition for peace
becomes apparent. More
An outsider
looks at the Palestinian - Israeli Conflict - Anyone interested in creative
solutions to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict must read this essay by Matthew Hogan PEACEMAKING VIA NON-IDEOLOGY or
CONFESSIONS OF A PRO-ISRAEL ANTI-ZIONIST.
New - The PEACE Deir Yassin Memorial Web site - history of
a massacre that some people try to deny - has been updated. The update includes an English translation of the original
Red Cross report available for the first time, and reflections on how the issue - and the Web site have been
exploited and misunderstood by both sides. |